Compare how Kym Richardson and Michael Ferguson voted on increasing Aboriginal land rights

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing Aboriginal land rights” which either Kym Richardson or Michael Ferguson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kym Richardson and Michael Ferguson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Kym Richardson	Michael Ferguson	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing Aboriginal land rights” which either Kym Richardson or Michael Ferguson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Kym Richardson	Michael Ferguson	Supporters vote
17th Aug 2006, 1:52 PM – Representatives Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment Bill 2006 - Consideration of Senate Message - Intertidal claims	No	No	Yes
19th Jun 2006, 8:50 PM – Representatives Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Read a second time	Yes	Yes	No
19th Jun 2006, 8:39 PM – Representatives Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Keep the words unchanged	Yes	Yes	Yes