Compare how Matt Thistlethwaite and Kate Lundy voted on increasing investment in the coal industry
Matt Thistlethwaite
Australian Labor Party Representative for Kingsford Smith since September 2013
Kate Lundy
Former Australian Labor Party Senator for ACT March 1996 – March 2015
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase its investment in and support for the Australian coal industry
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which either Matt Thistlethwaite or Kate Lundy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matt Thistlethwaite and Kate Lundy on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Matt Thistlethwaite | Kate Lundy | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which either Matt Thistlethwaite or Kate Lundy could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Matt Thistlethwaite | Kate Lundy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
9th Mar 2023, 9:40 AM – Representatives National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Prohibited investments |
Yes | - | No |
3rd Mar 2015 – Senate Motions — Liverpool Plains |
- | No | No |
24th Nov 2014, 5:13 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Galilee Basin |
- | absent | No |
28th Oct 2014, 4:07 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Acknowledge massive economic benefits |
- | absent | Yes |
15th Mar 2012, 12:12 PM – Senate Motions - Coal - From coal to clean energy market |
No | No | No |
10th Sep 2009, 9:41 AM – Senate Motions - Coal Exploration and Mining in the Galilee Basin - Concerns |
- | No | No |
8th Feb 2007, 10:57 AM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Reduce coal exports |
- | No | No |