We can't say anything concrete about how Joel Fitzgibbon voted on getting rid of Sunday and public holiday penalty rates
How Joel Fitzgibbon voted compared to someone who agrees that there should be no penalty rates when employees work on Sundays or public holidays
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for getting rid of Sunday and public holiday penalty rates” which Joel Fitzgibbon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Joel Fitzgibbon on this policy.
| Division | Joel Fitzgibbon | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for getting rid of Sunday and public holiday penalty rates” which Joel Fitzgibbon could have attended.
| Division | Joel Fitzgibbon | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Oct 2017, 10:31 AM – Representatives Fair Work Laws Amendment (Proper Use of Worker Benefits) Bill 2017 - Report from Federation Chamber - Penalty rates |
absent | No |
11th May 2017, 12:11 PM – Representatives Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Vulnerable Workers) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Keep penalty rates |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Joel Fitzgibbon has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.