Compare how Joel Fitzgibbon and Matt Thistlethwaite voted on increasing restrictions on gambling
Joel Fitzgibbon
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Hunter March 1996 – May 2022
Matt Thistlethwaite
Australian Labor Party Representative for Kingsford Smith since September 2013
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should increase restrictions on the gambling industry in order to address the issue of problem gambling
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which either Joel Fitzgibbon or Matt Thistlethwaite could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Joel Fitzgibbon and Matt Thistlethwaite on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Joel Fitzgibbon | Matt Thistlethwaite | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which either Joel Fitzgibbon or Matt Thistlethwaite could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Joel Fitzgibbon | Matt Thistlethwaite | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
8th Feb 2017, 5:11 PM – Representatives Interactive Gambling Amendment Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Phase out ads relating to betting or gambling |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
29th Nov 2012, 1:55 PM – Representatives National Gambling Reform Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill |
Yes | - | Yes |
29th Nov 2012, 1:24 PM – Representatives National Gambling Reform Bill 2012 — Second Reading — Read a second time |
Yes | - | Yes |
9th Feb 2012, 12:55 PM – Senate Documents — Gambling; Order for the Production of Documents |
- | No | Yes |