We can't say anything concrete about how Clare O'Neil voted on treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency
How Clare O'Neil voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should treat the COVID-19 vaccination as a matter of urgency and ensure that Australians are being vaccinated as fast as possible, starting with essential workers such as staff working in hospitals and aged care facilities
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency” which Clare O'Neil could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Clare O'Neil on this policy.
| Division | Clare O'Neil | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for treating the COVID vaccine rollout as a matter of urgency” which Clare O'Neil could have attended.
| Division | Clare O'Neil | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Jun 2021, 6:52 PM – Representatives Covid-19 Disaster Payment (Funding Arrangements) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Quarantine and vaccine program |
absent | No |
17th Jun 2021, 11:27 AM – Representatives Social Services Legislation Amendment (Portability Extensions) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Age pension and pensioners stranded overseas |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Clare O'Neil was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.