We can't say anything concrete about how Clare O'Neil voted on privatising certain government services
How Clare O'Neil voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give the private sector control over running and managing some of its services (such as public welfare, aged care and visa services) by either outsourcing or privatisation
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for privatising certain government services” which Clare O'Neil could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Clare O'Neil on this policy.
| Division | Clare O'Neil | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Oct 2016, 6:04 PM – Representatives National Cancer Screening Register Bill 2016 and another - Consideration in Detail - Privatisation |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for privatising certain government services” which Clare O'Neil could have attended.
| Division | Clare O'Neil | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Sep 2019, 1:14 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Streamlining Visa Processing) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Stop privatisation |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Clare O'Neil has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.