We can't say anything concrete about how Clare O'Neil voted on stopping people who arrive by boat from ever coming to Australia
How Clare O'Neil voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ban people who arrive in Australia by boat and claim asylum from ever being able to apply for an Australian visa
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stopping people who arrive by boat from ever coming to Australia” which Clare O'Neil could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Clare O'Neil on this policy.
| Division | Clare O'Neil | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Nov 2016, 12:59 PM – Representatives Migration Legislation Amendment (Regional Processing Cohort) Bill 2016 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
10th Nov 2016, 12:53 PM – Representatives Migration Legislation Amendment (Regional Processing Cohort) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stopping people who arrive by boat from ever coming to Australia” which Clare O'Neil could have attended.
| Division | Clare O'Neil | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Clare O'Neil was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.