We can't say anything concrete about how Clare O'Neil voted on increasing the initial tax rate for working holiday makers to 19%
How Clare O'Neil voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the tax rate for working holiday visa holders so that they are taxed at a rate of 19% on every dollar earned up to $37,000
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the initial tax rate for working holiday makers to 19%” which Clare O'Neil could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Clare O'Neil on this policy.
| Division | Clare O'Neil | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2016, 4:51 PM – Representatives Income Tax Rates Amendment (Working Holiday Maker Reform) Bill 2016 - Consideration of Senate Message - Reject Senate amendments |
absent | Yes |
24th Nov 2016 – Representatives Income Tax Rates Amendment (Working Holiday Maker Reform) Bill 2016 - Consideration of Senate Message - Accept amendment |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the initial tax rate for working holiday makers to 19%” which Clare O'Neil could have attended.
| Division | Clare O'Neil | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Clare O'Neil was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.