We can't say anything concrete about how Paul Neville voted on increasing funding for university education
How Paul Neville voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for university education
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Paul Neville could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Paul Neville on this policy.
| Division | Paul Neville | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Paul Neville could have attended.
| Division | Paul Neville | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Jun 2013, 1:31 PM – Representatives Private Members' Business - University Funding - Reverse decision to cut univeristy funding |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Paul Neville has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.