Compare how Katie Allen and Daniel Mulino voted on stopping tax avoidance or aggressive tax minimisation

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stopping tax avoidance or aggressive tax minimisation” which either Katie Allen or Daniel Mulino could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Katie Allen and Daniel Mulino on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Katie Allen Daniel Mulino Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stopping tax avoidance or aggressive tax minimisation” which either Katie Allen or Daniel Mulino could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Katie Allen Daniel Mulino Supporters vote

18th Jun 2020, 10:51 AM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (2020 Measures No. 2) Bill 2020 - Consideration of Senate Message - Disagree with Senate amendments

Yes No No

17th Jun 2020, 4:53 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (2020 Measures No. 2) Bill 2020 - Consideration of Senate Message - Disagree with Senate amendments

Yes No No