We can't say anything concrete about how Phillip Thompson voted on Build to Rent (BTR)
How Phillip Thompson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should address the rental crisis by supporting Build to Rent (BTR) with tax incentives, so as to encourage the development of more multi-apartment buildings where the apartments are rented out (usually through a single management entity) rather than sold
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Build to Rent (BTR)” which Phillip Thompson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Phillip Thompson on this policy.
| Division | Phillip Thompson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
27th Jun 2024, 10:25 AM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Responsible Buy Now Pay Later and Other Measures) Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Delete Schedule 1 |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Build to Rent (BTR)” which Phillip Thompson could have attended.
| Division | Phillip Thompson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
27th Jun 2024, 10:13 AM – Representatives Capital Works (Build to Rent Misuse Tax) Bill 2024 - Report from Federation Chamber - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
27th Jun 2024, 10:04 AM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Responsible Buy Now Pay Later and Other Measures) Bill 2024 - Report from Federation Chamber - Criticism of Government |
absent | No |
27th Jun 2024, 9:56 AM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Responsible Buy Now Pay Later and Other Measures) Bill 2024 - Report from Federation Chamber - Criticism of Government |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Phillip Thompson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.