We can't say anything concrete about how Sharryn Jackson voted on increasing the age pension
How Sharryn Jackson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the amount of the age pension
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the age pension” which Sharryn Jackson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sharryn Jackson on this policy.
| Division | Sharryn Jackson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the age pension” which Sharryn Jackson could have attended.
| Division | Sharryn Jackson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Sep 2008, 6:14 PM – Representatives Motions - Urgent Relief for Single Age Pensioners Bill 2008 - Consideration of Senate Message |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Sharryn Jackson has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.