Compare how Sharryn Jackson and Lindsay Tanner voted on increasing consumer protections
![Photo of Sharryn Jackson](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10328.jpg)
Sharryn Jackson
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Hasluck November 2007 – August 2010
![Photo of Lindsay Tanner](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10621.jpg)
Lindsay Tanner
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Melbourne March 1993 – August 2010
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases consumer protections by, for example, encouraging competition
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing consumer protections” which either Sharryn Jackson or Lindsay Tanner could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sharryn Jackson and Lindsay Tanner on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing consumer protections” which either Sharryn Jackson or Lindsay Tanner could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Sharryn Jackson | Lindsay Tanner | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
5th Jun 2008, 5:36 PM – Representatives National Fuelwatch (Empowering Consumers) Bill 2008 — Second Reading — Keep motion to read a second time unchanged |
Yes | Yes | Yes |