How Max Chandler-Mather voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should reduce tax concessions for high earners and those of high socio-economic status

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing tax concessions for high socio-economic status” which Max Chandler-Mather could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Max Chandler-Mather on this policy.

Division Max Chandler-Mather Supporters vote

9th Oct 2024, 4:17 PM – Representatives Superannuation (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions) Imposition Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with main idea of the bill

absent Yes

9th Oct 2024, 4:09 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions and Other Measures) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bill

absent Yes

9th Oct 2024, 3:29 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions and Other Measures) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Omit schedules 1-3

absent Yes

16th May 2024, 5:22 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions and Other Measures) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing tax concessions for high socio-economic status” which Max Chandler-Mather could have attended.

Division Max Chandler-Mather Supporters vote
no votes listed

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Max Chandler-Mather was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.