Compare how Max Chandler-Mather and Meryl Swanson voted on the Paris Climate Agreement
Max Chandler-Mather
Australian Greens Representative for Griffith since May 2022
Meryl Swanson
Australian Labor Party Representative for Paterson since July 2016
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should amend its laws and policies to meet the objectives of the Paris Climate Agreement
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which either Max Chandler-Mather or Meryl Swanson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Max Chandler-Mather and Meryl Swanson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Max Chandler-Mather | Meryl Swanson | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which either Max Chandler-Mather or Meryl Swanson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".