We can't say anything concrete about how Michelle Rowland voted on a character test for Australian visas
How Michelle Rowland voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should impose a character test on all non-citizens holding or applying for an Australian visa which would give the minister the power to cancel or refuse a visa under certain character-related circumstances as set out in the relevant legislation
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a character test for Australian visas” which Michelle Rowland could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michelle Rowland on this policy.
| Division | Michelle Rowland | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Feb 2023, 4:41 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Aggregate Sentences) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bill |
absent | Yes |
18th Sep 2019, 7:30 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Strengthening the Character Test) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
18th Sep 2019, 7:24 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Strengthening the Character Test) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Refuse a second reading |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a character test for Australian visas” which Michelle Rowland could have attended.
| Division | Michelle Rowland | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Michelle Rowland was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.