We can't say anything concrete about how Michelle Rowland voted on privatising government-owned assets
How Michelle Rowland voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should privatise government owned assets
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for privatising government-owned assets” which Michelle Rowland could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michelle Rowland on this policy.
| Division | Michelle Rowland | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for privatising government-owned assets” which Michelle Rowland could have attended.
| Division | Michelle Rowland | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Mar 2014, 6:35 PM – Representatives Land Transport Infrastructure Amendment Bill 2014 — Consideration in Detail — Agree to the bill |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Michelle Rowland has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.