We can't say anything concrete about how Anthony Albanese voted on introducing digital ID
How Anthony Albanese voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation to establish digital ID in Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for introducing digital ID” which Anthony Albanese could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Albanese on this policy.
| Division | Anthony Albanese | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th May 2024, 4:41 PM – Representatives Digital Id Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for introducing digital ID” which Anthony Albanese could have attended.
| Division | Anthony Albanese | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Anthony Albanese was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.