Compare how Anthony Albanese and David Coleman voted on tighter means testing of family payments
Anthony Albanese
Australian Labor Party Representative for Grayndler since March 1996
David Coleman
Liberal Party Representative for Banks since September 2013
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should target family payments to low and moderate income households, to the exclusion of higher income households.
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which either Anthony Albanese or David Coleman could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Albanese and David Coleman on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Anthony Albanese | David Coleman | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which either Anthony Albanese or David Coleman could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".