We can't say anything concrete about how Andrew Robb voted on increasing funding for university education
How Andrew Robb voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for university education
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Andrew Robb could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew Robb on this policy.
| Division | Andrew Robb | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Andrew Robb could have attended.
| Division | Andrew Robb | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Dec 2013, 8:16 PM – Representatives Higher Education Support Amendment (Savings and Other Measures) Bill 2013 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | No |
20th Jun 2013, 1:31 PM – Representatives Private Members' Business - University Funding - Reverse decision to cut univeristy funding |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Andrew Robb was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.