We can't say anything concrete about how Tim Watts voted on protecting whistleblowers
How Tim Watts voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation to protect people who disclose information for the benefit of the public interest and protect the journalists who report it
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting whistleblowers” which Tim Watts could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Watts on this policy.
| Division | Tim Watts | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting whistleblowers” which Tim Watts could have attended.
| Division | Tim Watts | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2022, 1:09 PM – Representatives National Anti-Corruption Commission Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Journalist activities not corrupt conduct |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tim Watts was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.