Compare how Nicola Roxon and Alex Hawke voted on tobacco plain packaging
Nicola Roxon
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Gellibrand October 1998 – August 2013
Alex Hawke
Liberal Party Representative for Mitchell since November 2007
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce plain packaging for tobacco products
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for tobacco plain packaging” which either Nicola Roxon or Alex Hawke could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nicola Roxon and Alex Hawke on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Nicola Roxon | Alex Hawke | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
24th Aug 2011 – Representatives Trade Marks Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
Yes | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for tobacco plain packaging” which either Nicola Roxon or Alex Hawke could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Nicola Roxon | Alex Hawke | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
24th Aug 2011 – Representatives Tobacco Plain Packaging Bill 2011 - Consideration in Detail - Limit application |
No | Yes | No |