We can't say anything concrete about how Harry Quick voted on increasing competition in bulk wheat export
How Harry Quick voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should deregulate Australia's wheat export market so that bulk wheat export is no longer done through a single exporter (which is known as a 'single desk' policy)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing competition in bulk wheat export” which Harry Quick could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Harry Quick on this policy.
| Division | Harry Quick | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing competition in bulk wheat export” which Harry Quick could have attended.
| Division | Harry Quick | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Dec 2006, 7:58 PM – Representatives Wheat Marketing Amendment Bill 2006 - Consideration in Detail - Independent review |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Harry Quick has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.