We can't say anything concrete about how Harry Quick voted on increasing investment in renewable energy
How Harry Quick voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase investment in renewable energy technologies
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing investment in renewable energy” which Harry Quick could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Harry Quick on this policy.
| Division | Harry Quick | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing investment in renewable energy” which Harry Quick could have attended.
| Division | Harry Quick | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Jun 2006, 6:11 PM – Representatives Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Stand as part of the question |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Harry Quick was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.