How Dai Le voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should amend its laws and policies to meet the objectives of the Paris Climate Agreement

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which Dai Le could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Dai Le on this policy.

Division Dai Le Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which Dai Le could have attended.

Division Dai Le Supporters vote

9th Mar 2023, 9:40 AM – Representatives National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Prohibited investments

absent Yes

8th Sep 2022, 4:26 PM – Representatives Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate amendment

absent Yes

8th Sep 2022, 4:20 PM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate amendments

absent Yes

4th Aug 2022, 12:33 PM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bills

absent Yes

4th Aug 2022, 12:24 PM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Article 2 of the Paris Agreement

absent Yes

4th Aug 2022, 12:11 PM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Act on Climate Change Authority advice

Yes Yes

4th Aug 2022, 9:51 AM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Dai Le has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.