Compare how Dai Le and Anika Wells voted on net zero emissions by 2035
![Photo of Dai Le](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10978.jpg)
Dai Le
Independent Representative for Fowler since May 2022
![Photo of Anika Wells](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10931.jpg)
Anika Wells
Australian Labor Party Representative for Lilley since May 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to achieving net zero emissions by 2035 as part of Australia's efforts to address climate change
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2035” which either Dai Le or Anika Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Dai Le and Anika Wells on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Dai Le | Anika Wells | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
4th Aug 2022, 11:25 AM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - More ambitious targets |
Yes | Yes | No |
4th Aug 2022, 11:03 AM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - More ambitious targets needed |
Yes | Yes | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2035” which either Dai Le or Anika Wells could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Dai Le | Anika Wells | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |