Compare how Chris Hayes and Sharon Claydon voted on increasing support for the Australian shipping industry
![Photo of Chris Hayes](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10294.jpg)
Chris Hayes
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Fowler August 2010 – May 2022
![Photo of Sharon Claydon](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10805.jpg)
Sharon Claydon
Australian Labor Party Representative for Newcastle since September 2013
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should increase financial and regulation-based support for the Australian shipping and maritime industry to ensure its future viability and competitiveness
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing support for the Australian shipping industry” which either Chris Hayes or Sharon Claydon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Hayes and Sharon Claydon on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Chris Hayes | Sharon Claydon | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing support for the Australian shipping industry” which either Chris Hayes or Sharon Claydon could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".