We can't say anything concrete about how Bert Van Manen voted on banning pay secrecy clauses
How Bert Van Manen voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ban pay secrecy clauses so that employees can freely discuss and compare their pay with others
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning pay secrecy clauses” which Bert Van Manen could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bert Van Manen on this policy.
| Division | Bert Van Manen | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Nov 2022, 1:02 PM – Representatives Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
10th Nov 2022, 12:59 PM – Representatives Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the amended bill |
absent | Yes |
10th Nov 2022, 9:31 AM – Representatives Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning pay secrecy clauses” which Bert Van Manen could have attended.
| Division | Bert Van Manen | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Nov 2022, 4:25 PM – Representatives Business - Consideration of Legislation Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bert Van Manen was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.