We can't say anything concrete about how Ken O'Dowd voted on increasing support for rural and regional Australia
How Ken O'Dowd voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase its funding for initiatives that support rural and regional communities
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing support for rural and regional Australia” which Ken O'Dowd could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ken O'Dowd on this policy.
| Division | Ken O'Dowd | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing support for rural and regional Australia” which Ken O'Dowd could have attended.
| Division | Ken O'Dowd | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Jun 2020, 7:24 PM – Representatives National Skills Commissioner Bill 2020 - Consideration in Detail - Regional Australia |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Ken O'Dowd has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.