We can't say anything concrete about how Peter Slipper voted on implementing refugee and protection conventions
How Peter Slipper voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should implement the international conventions that relate to seeking refuge and protection from torture. These include the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees and the non-refoulement provisions of the UN Convention Against Torture and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which Peter Slipper could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Slipper on this policy.
| Division | Peter Slipper | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
27th Jun 2012, 6:48 PM – Representatives Migration Legislation Amendment (The Bali Process) Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Party to Refugees Convention or Protocol |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which Peter Slipper could have attended.
| Division | Peter Slipper | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Peter Slipper was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.