We can't say anything concrete about how Mal Brough voted on increasing competition in bulk wheat export
How Mal Brough voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should deregulate Australia's wheat export market so that bulk wheat export is no longer done through a single exporter (which is known as a 'single desk' policy)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing competition in bulk wheat export” which Mal Brough could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mal Brough on this policy.
| Division | Mal Brough | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing competition in bulk wheat export” which Mal Brough could have attended.
| Division | Mal Brough | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Dec 2006, 7:58 PM – Representatives Wheat Marketing Amendment Bill 2006 - Consideration in Detail - Independent review |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Mal Brough was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.