Compare how Andrew Leigh and Peter Khalil voted on making the cashless debit card program voluntary and not mandatory

Photo of Andrew Leigh

Andrew Leigh

Australian Labor Party Representative for Fenner since July 2016

Voted consistently for making the cashless debit card program voluntary and not mandatory
Photo of Peter Khalil

Peter Khalil

Australian Labor Party Representative for Wills since July 2016

Voted consistently for making the cashless debit card program voluntary and not mandatory

How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should make the cashless debit card program (a program where welfare payments are put onto controlled debit cards, also known as Indue cards, for restricted use) voluntary so that people are not forced to participate in it

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for making the cashless debit card program voluntary and not mandatory” which either Andrew Leigh or Peter Khalil could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew Leigh and Peter Khalil on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Andrew Leigh Peter Khalil Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for making the cashless debit card program voluntary and not mandatory” which either Andrew Leigh or Peter Khalil could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Andrew Leigh Peter Khalil Supporters vote

28th Mar 2023, 5:20 PM – Representatives Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Income Management Reform) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Against compulsory income management

Yes Yes Yes

30th Jul 2019, 6:11 PM – Representatives Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Cashless Welfare) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Make voluntary

Yes Yes Yes