How Clive Palmer voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should target family payments to low and moderate income households, to the exclusion of higher income households.
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which Clive Palmer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Clive Palmer on this policy.
|no votes listed
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which Clive Palmer could have attended.
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Clive Palmer has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.