We can't say anything concrete about how Clive Palmer voted on decreasing availability of welfare payments
How Clive Palmer voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should limit the availability of government social security payments
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing availability of welfare payments” which Clive Palmer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Clive Palmer on this policy.
| Division | Clive Palmer | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Feb 2016, 3:19 PM – Representatives Social Services Legislation Amendment (Budget Repair) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
22nd Oct 2014, 7:48 PM – Representatives Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Seniors Supplement Cessation) Bill 2014 and two related bills - Third Reading - Pass the bills |
absent | Yes |
24th Jun 2014, 10:07 PM – Representatives Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (2014 Budget Measures No. 1) Bill 2014 and related bill - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
24th Jun 2014, 9:13 PM – Representatives Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (2014 Budget Measures No. 1) Bill 2014 and related bill - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
18th Jun 2014, 11:53 AM – Representatives Family Assistance Legislation Amendment (Child Care Measures) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing availability of welfare payments” which Clive Palmer could have attended.
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Clive Palmer has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.