We can't say anything concrete about how Clive Palmer voted on restricting foreign ownership
How Clive Palmer voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should restrict foreign ownership within Australia, particularly where foreign ownership would be against the national interest
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which Clive Palmer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Clive Palmer on this policy.
| Division | Clive Palmer | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which Clive Palmer could have attended.
| Division | Clive Palmer | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
6th Mar 2014, 12:37 PM – Representatives Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | No |
6th Mar 2014, 12:01 PM – Representatives Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to bill |
absent | No |
6th Mar 2014 – Representatives Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Clive Palmer was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.