We can't say anything concrete about how Stuart Robert voted on compulsory income management for welfare recipients
How Stuart Robert voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce a hybrid welfare quarantining regime to replace the Cashless Debit Card (CDC) regime and it should be compulsory for certain recipients
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for compulsory income management for welfare recipients” which Stuart Robert could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stuart Robert on this policy.
| Division | Stuart Robert | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Mar 2023, 6:00 PM – Representatives Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Income Management Reform) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - No compulsory income management |
absent | Yes |
28th Mar 2023, 5:34 PM – Representatives Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Income Management Reform) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for compulsory income management for welfare recipients” which Stuart Robert could have attended.
| Division | Stuart Robert | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Stuart Robert was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.