![Photo of Mike Kelly](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10359.jpg)
We can't say anything concrete about how Mike Kelly voted on political intervention in research funding grants
How Mike Kelly voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should be able to intervene in the research grant process with the Australian Research Council (ARC) by, for example, vetoing certain grant application where considered appropriate
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for political intervention in research funding grants” which Mike Kelly could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mike Kelly on this policy.
Division | Mike Kelly | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for political intervention in research funding grants” which Mike Kelly could have attended.
Division | Mike Kelly | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
26th Nov 2019, 5:12 PM – Representatives Australian Research Council Amendment Bill 2019 - Consideration in Detail - Anouncement process |
absent | No |
26th Nov 2019, 4:51 PM – Representatives Australian Research Council Amendment Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Research cuts |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Mike Kelly was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.