We can't say anything concrete about how Peta Murphy voted on community right to say no to nuclear waste disposal sites
How Peta Murphy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should be required to seek the consent of local communities before selecting new sites for radioactive waste disposal
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for community right to say no to nuclear waste disposal sites” which Peta Murphy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peta Murphy on this policy.
| Division | Peta Murphy | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for community right to say no to nuclear waste disposal sites” which Peta Murphy could have attended.
| Division | Peta Murphy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Jun 2020, 12:54 PM – Representatives National Radioactive Waste Management Amendment (Site Specification, Community Fund and Other Measures) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Peta Murphy was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.