We can't say anything concrete about how Peta Murphy voted on transgender rights
How Peta Murphy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the rights of transgender people (including genderfluid, nonbinary and genderqueer people) by amending laws and policies to support healthy lives by, for example, ensuring that appropriate healthcare is available nationwide and that trans people are protected from discrimination and harassment
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Peta Murphy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peta Murphy on this policy.
| Division | Peta Murphy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
9th Feb 2022, 3:53 AM – Representatives Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | No |
9th Feb 2022, 2:20 AM – Representatives Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Statements of belief |
absent | No |
9th Feb 2022, 1:20 AM – Representatives Religious Discrimination Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Peta Murphy could have attended.
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Peta Murphy was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.