We can't say anything concrete about how Peta Murphy voted on federal government action on animal & plant extinctions
How Peta Murphy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government needs to support research and conservation initiatives that aim to put a stop to the current trajectory of animal and plant extinctions in Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Peta Murphy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peta Murphy on this policy.
| Division | Peta Murphy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Sep 2020, 5:40 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Streamlining Environmental Approvals) Bill 2020 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Peta Murphy could have attended.
| Division | Peta Murphy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Jun 2021, 7:14 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Standards and Assurance) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Do not reject bill |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Peta Murphy was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.