Compare how Peter Dutton and Luke Hartsuyker voted on increasing the price of subsidised medicine
Peter Dutton
Liberal Party Representative for Dickson since November 2001
Luke Hartsuyker
Former National Party Representative for Cowper November 2001 – May 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the amount that patients pay for medicine under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and the Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (known as the 'co-payment')
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the price of subsidised medicine” which either Peter Dutton or Luke Hartsuyker could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Dutton and Luke Hartsuyker on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Peter Dutton | Luke Hartsuyker | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
16th Jul 2014, 6:36 PM – Representatives National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 2014 — Third Reading — Read a third time |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
16th Jul 2014, 6:05 PM – Representatives National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 2014 — Consideration in Detail — Agree to the bill |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
16th Jul 2014, 4:30 PM – Representatives National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 2014 — Second Reading — Read a second time |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the price of subsidised medicine” which either Peter Dutton or Luke Hartsuyker could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Peter Dutton | Luke Hartsuyker | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||