How George Christensen voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ensure that Australian laws protect the reproductive bodily autonomy of women and other people capable of childbearing by, for example, protecting them from pregnancy-related discrimination and ensuring they have access to pregnancy-related healthcare services, which include affordable contraception, maternity care and abortion services

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reproductive bodily autonomy” which George Christensen could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Christensen on this policy.

Division George Christensen Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reproductive bodily autonomy” which George Christensen could have attended.

Division George Christensen Supporters vote

9th Feb 2022, 4:41 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with amended bill

absent Yes

9th Feb 2022, 4:32 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Students

absent Yes

9th Feb 2022, 4:24 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Students

absent No

9th Feb 2022, 4:11 AM – Representatives Human Rights Legislation Amendment Bill 2021 - Consideration in Detail - Teachers

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case George Christensen was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.