We can't say anything concrete about how Julie Bishop voted on carbon farming
How Julie Bishop voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce a carbon farming initiative that encourages the farming and timber industries to decrease carbon emissions or to increase carbon storage (known as carbon sequestration)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for carbon farming” which Julie Bishop could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Julie Bishop on this policy.
| Division | Julie Bishop | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Jun 2011 – Representatives Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for carbon farming” which Julie Bishop could have attended.
| Division | Julie Bishop | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Jun 2011 – Representatives Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Keep original motion unchanged |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Julie Bishop was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.