We can't say anything concrete about how Julie Bishop voted on a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
How Julie Bishop voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should unify the Federal Circuit Court of Australia and the Family Court of Australia so that they are one court to be known as the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which Julie Bishop could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Julie Bishop on this policy.
| Division | Julie Bishop | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
27th Nov 2018, 5:23 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
27th Nov 2018, 5:14 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
27th Nov 2018, 5:03 PM – Representatives Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which Julie Bishop could have attended.
| Division | Julie Bishop | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Julie Bishop was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.