We can't say anything concrete about how Pat Conaghan voted on a transition plan for coal workers
How Pat Conaghan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should develop and implement a plan to transition workers in the coal industry to other industries
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a transition plan for coal workers” which Pat Conaghan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Pat Conaghan on this policy.
| Division | Pat Conaghan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
9th Sep 2024, 12:09 PM – Representatives Net Zero Economy Authority Bill 2024 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree and pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
4th Jun 2024, 6:12 PM – Representatives Net Zero Economy Authority Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bill |
absent | Yes |
4th Jun 2024, 4:17 PM – Representatives Net Zero Economy Authority Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a transition plan for coal workers” which Pat Conaghan could have attended.
| Division | Pat Conaghan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Jun 2024, 6:22 PM – Representatives Net Zero Economy Authority (Transitional Provisions) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea of the bill |
absent | Yes |
4th Jun 2024, 5:56 PM – Representatives Net Zero Economy Authority Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Increase scope of bill |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Pat Conaghan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.