How Pat Conaghan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase its funding for initiatives that support rural and regional communities

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing support for rural and regional Australia” which Pat Conaghan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Pat Conaghan on this policy.

Division Pat Conaghan Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing support for rural and regional Australia” which Pat Conaghan could have attended.

Division Pat Conaghan Supporters vote

16th Feb 2023, 9:05 AM – Representatives National Housing Supply and Affordability Council Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Regional Australia and critical infrastructure

absent No

15th Feb 2023, 6:26 PM – Representatives Housing Australia Future Fund Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Proportion of grants to regional, rural and remote Australia

absent No

4th Aug 2022, 10:49 AM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Regional Australia

No Yes

10th Jun 2020, 7:24 PM – Representatives National Skills Commissioner Bill 2020 - Consideration in Detail - Regional Australia

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Pat Conaghan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.