Compare how Pat Conaghan and Andrew Hastie voted on introducing digital ID
Pat Conaghan
National Party Representative for Cowper since May 2019
Andrew Hastie
Liberal Party Representative for Canning since September 2015
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation to establish digital ID in Australia
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for introducing digital ID” which either Pat Conaghan or Andrew Hastie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Pat Conaghan and Andrew Hastie on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Pat Conaghan | Andrew Hastie | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
16th May 2024, 4:41 PM – Representatives Digital Id Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
No | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for introducing digital ID” which either Pat Conaghan or Andrew Hastie could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Pat Conaghan | Andrew Hastie | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |