We can't say anything concrete about how Luke Simpkins voted on increasing funding for university education
How Luke Simpkins voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for university education
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Luke Simpkins could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Luke Simpkins on this policy.
| Division | Luke Simpkins | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Luke Simpkins could have attended.
| Division | Luke Simpkins | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Dec 2013, 8:16 PM – Representatives Higher Education Support Amendment (Savings and Other Measures) Bill 2013 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
Yes | No |
20th Jun 2013, 1:31 PM – Representatives Private Members' Business - University Funding - Reverse decision to cut univeristy funding |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Luke Simpkins has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.