We can't say anything concrete about how Richard Marles voted on privatising government-owned assets
How Richard Marles voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should privatise government owned assets
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for privatising government-owned assets” which Richard Marles could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Richard Marles on this policy.
Division | Richard Marles | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for privatising government-owned assets” which Richard Marles could have attended.
Division | Richard Marles | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
24th Mar 2014, 6:35 PM – Representatives Land Transport Infrastructure Amendment Bill 2014 — Consideration in Detail — Agree to the bill |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Richard Marles was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.