How Gavan O'Connor voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should close its Nauru Regional Processing Centre and stop all Nauru-based processing of people's claims for asylum

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Nauru” which Gavan O'Connor could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Gavan O'Connor on this policy.

Division Gavan O'Connor Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Nauru” which Gavan O'Connor could have attended.

Division Gavan O'Connor Supporters vote

10th Aug 2006, 12:57 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Read a third time

absent No

10th Aug 2006, 12:46 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Read a second time

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Gavan O'Connor was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.